home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.ecn.bgu.edu!usenet
- From: Ignatius <i-wong@wiu.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: MFC or OWL?
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 18:37:10 +0000
- Organization: Western Illinois University
- Message-ID: <314EFED6.57C6@wiu.edu>
- References: <DKKv8H.K35@iquest.net> <4i8od1$clt@Steinlager.tip.net> <4ifasb$rkm@druid.borland.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tty001.wiu.bgu.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (WinNT; I)
- CC: i-wong@wiu.edu
-
- Pete Becker wrote:
- >
- > In article <4i8od1$clt@Steinlager.tip.net>, nihtila@nihtila.pp.se says...
- > >
- > >Many people thinks that Borland is going to drop of the support for OWL...
- >
- > They are wrong.
-
- Hi,
-
- Is there any vendor's Web Site that discusses about its own
- product (OWL or MFC), like the IBM's Software Quarterly?
-
- TIA.
-
- # ig
-